The self-proclaimed ‘Satoshi Nakamoto,’ Craig Wright is being sued for $10 bln by deceased business partner’s brother.
Chief scientist of nChain and self-proclaimed mind behind the Satoshi Nakamoto pseudonym, Craig Wright, is being sued for $10 bln. The suit is brought to the United States District Court of the Southern District of Florida by Ira Kleiman.
According to the plaintiff Ira Kleiman, Wright stole a sum of 1.1 mln BTC, over $10 bln dollars at today’s rate, from David Kleiman’s estate. The statement by the plaintiff alleges that Wright recognized that Kleiman’s friends and family were initially unaware of the wealth he accumulated.
The official complaint states that Wright took advantage of this and “forged a series of contracts that purported to transfer Dave’s assets to Craig and/or companies controlled by him. Craig backdated these contracts and forged Dave’s signature on them.”
The plaintiff continues to claim that, following David Kleiman’s death on April 26, 2013, Wright contacted Ira Kleiman and disclosed that he and David had worked together to develop Blockchain and Bitcoin.
However, it is alleged that David had signed away any rights to any resulting wealth or intellectual property in exchange for a non-controlling and non-operational share in an Australian company. According to the plaintiff, Wright estimated the share to be worth “millions”., and informed Ira Kleiman that he’d be able to sell the share on the estate’s behalf within a few months.
Apparently this was a lie, as the company went bankrupt after Wright misled the Australian Taxation Office (ATO). In late 2015, Australian police raided Wright’s home, and Wright fled to the UK from Australia.
To date, the plaintiff states that Wright hasn’t returned any of the bitcoins or the intellectual property rights to the Kleiman estate. The lawsuit is “brought to rectify that injustice.”
Kleiman is seeking compensation for the intellectual property in addition to the 1.1 mln BTC fortune.
While Wright no longer claims he is Satoshi Nakamoto, and the lawsuit does not seek to discover or define the identity of that individual, the proceedings may require that identity to be established in order to find a definite ruling.
Wright has issued a one-word statement regarding the lawsuit via Twitter: